mirror of
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
synced 2026-02-22 03:46:53 -05:00
Fix vect_need_peeling_or_partial_vectors_p wrt peeling for gaps
The code assuming that peeling for gaps can be elided by means of knowing niters and prologue peeling is wrong. Peeling for gaps means we need an epilog. * tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_need_peeling_or_partial_vectors_p): When peeling for gaps we always need an epilog.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -942,6 +942,9 @@ vect_need_peeling_or_partial_vectors_p (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT const_vf;
|
||||
|
||||
if (LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS (loop_vinfo))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
loop_vec_info main_loop_vinfo
|
||||
= (LOOP_VINFO_EPILOGUE_P (loop_vinfo)
|
||||
? LOOP_VINFO_MAIN_LOOP_INFO (loop_vinfo) : loop_vinfo);
|
||||
@@ -952,14 +955,11 @@ vect_need_peeling_or_partial_vectors_p (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo)
|
||||
peeled for reasons other than niters. */
|
||||
unsigned int peel_niter
|
||||
= LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_ALIGNMENT (main_loop_vinfo);
|
||||
if (LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS (loop_vinfo))
|
||||
peel_niter += 1;
|
||||
return !multiple_p (LOOP_VINFO_INT_NITERS (loop_vinfo) - peel_niter,
|
||||
LOOP_VINFO_VECT_FACTOR (loop_vinfo));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_ALIGNMENT (main_loop_vinfo)
|
||||
&& !LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS (loop_vinfo)
|
||||
&& LOOP_VINFO_VECT_FACTOR (loop_vinfo).is_constant (&const_vf))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* When the number of iterations is a multiple of the vectorization
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user