KJ16609/gcc
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git synced 2026-02-22 12:00:03 -05:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

revert: cp-lang.c (cxx_types_compatible_p): To the middle-end, references and pointers are compatible.

Browse Source 
revert:
        * cp-lang.c (cxx_types_compatible_p): To the middle-end,
        references and pointers are compatible.

From-SVN: r84820
This commit is contained in:
Jason Merrill
2004-07-16 13:06:56 -04:00
parent 11368579a1
commit 043fdfc83e
2 changed files with 1 additions and 20 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
gcc/cp/ChangeLog
View File

@@ -60,11 +60,6 @@
(add_conversions): Likewise.
* semantics.c (finish_member_declaration): Adjust call to add_method.
2004-07-15 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
* cp-lang.c (cxx_types_compatible_p): To the middle-end,
references and pointers are compatible.
2004-07-15 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
* decl.c (xref_basetypes): Refactor.

16
gcc/cp/cp-lang.c
View File

@@ -317,23 +317,9 @@ cp_var_mod_type_p (tree type, tree fn)
return false;
}
/* This compares two types for equivalence ("compatible" in C-based languages).
This routine should only return 1 if it is sure. It should not be used
in contexts where erroneously returning 0 causes problems. */
static int cxx_types_compatible_p (tree x, tree y)
{
if (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (x, y))
return 1;
/* Once we get to the middle-end, references and pointers are
interchangeable. FIXME should we try to replace all references with
pointers? */
if (POINTER_TYPE_P (x) && POINTER_TYPE_P (y)
&& same_type_p (TREE_TYPE (x), TREE_TYPE (y)))
return 1;
return 0;
return same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (x, y);
}
/* Construct a C++-aware pretty-printer for CONTEXT. It is assumed