c++: Add test for C++20 NB comment CA107.

We already implemented this, but it's good to have a test.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-ca107.C: New test.
This commit is contained in:
Jason Merrill
2020-06-11 18:21:57 -04:00
parent 14c831f5ef
commit 68df8e8c34

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
// NB comments CA107/US117
// { dg-do compile { target concepts } }
template <unsigned N> constexpr bool Atomic = true;
template <unsigned N> concept C = Atomic<N>;
template <unsigned N> concept Add1 = C<N + 1>;
template <unsigned N> concept AddOne = C<N + 1>;
template <unsigned M> void f()
requires Add1<2 * M>;
template <unsigned M> int f()
requires AddOne<2 * M> && true;
int x = f<0>(); // OK, the atomic constraints from concept C in both fs are Atomic<N>
// with mapping similar to N -> 2 * M + 1
template <unsigned N> struct WrapN;
template <unsigned N> using Add1Ty = WrapN<N + 1>;
template <unsigned N> using AddOneTy = WrapN<N + 1>;
template <unsigned M> void g(Add1Ty<2 * M> *);
template <unsigned M> void g(AddOneTy<2 * M> *);
void h() {
g<0>(nullptr); // OK, there is only one g
}
template <unsigned N> void f2()
requires Add1<2 * N>;
template <unsigned N> int f2()
requires Add1<N * 2> && true;
void h2() {
f2<0>(); // { dg-error "ambiguous" } ill-formed, no diagnostic required:
// required determination of subsumption between atomic constraints that are
// functionally equivalent but not equivalent
}